Compare handmaids tale and 1984 Essay

In The Handmaid’s Tale Margaret Atwood puts over the feeling of secret, things that were once there yet are no more. She discusses ‘the sharp smell of sweat, shot through with the sweet smell of biting gum and perfume’ which originated from the young ladies who once viewed the b-ball coordinates that were ‘formally played there’. In the primary area of this book we get the inclination that the character is very lost, lost in what used to be and not in the present time and place. She informs us regarding the moves that ‘would have been held there’ and the waiting music that she could at present hear faintly. We get the inclination that this ladies has practically nothing, no close to home things, no riches; nothing. The way that the ladies in this structure were not permitted to trade names tells the peruser this is a jail, the ladies have no opportunity they are continually being viewed by the ‘Angels’ moreover in Nineteen Eighty-Four composed by George Orwell there is a huge comparability between the ‘Angels’ in The Handmaid’s Tale and the Posters in Nineteen Eighty-Four. The Angels watch over the ladies and in Nineteen Eighty-Four the banner which is depicted as a ‘one of those photos which are created to the point that the eyes tail you about when you move.’ Watch over each and every individual who passes by it. Underneath it the inscription read ‘BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU’ radiating the feeling that somebody, some place is watching this moderately aged man. The man portrayed on the banner some may state must be the depiction of Hitler; ‘a man of around forty-five, with s overwhelming dark mustache and roughly attractive features’ Winston additionally discloses to us that the banners were ‘plastered everywhere’ likewise uncovering, similar to The Handmaid’s Tale that no place is sheltered. Adding to this is the telescreen, which can't be turned off again might be an indication that a person or thing is continually watching you, and that you are rarely alone. Both the Angels and the Posters in these books are exceptionally scary figures or ‘objects of fear.’ The Angels didn't look or converse with the ladies just remained with their backs to them to show mastery. Correspondingly the ‘enormous face, in excess of a meter wide’ put on the dividers with the eyes that tailed you when you move is likewise observed as an indication of mastery. The two figures give indications of both animosity and extraordinary significance, the way that the Angles won't talk or take a gander at the ladies reveals to us that they areâ seen as more noteworthy than them. Notwithstanding this the way that there are such a significant number of these banners and the focusing look on the gigantic face likewise shows extraordinary inconvenience and stress.

Anowa- Whose Fault Free Essays

African Women Writers Tragic Responsibility Anowa is the second, last, and most practiced play composed by Ghanaian dramatist, artist, short-story author, and writer Ama Ata Aidoo. Anowa was first distributed in 1970 and had it’s British debut in London in 1991 (Enotes, 2013). It recounts to the tale of a youthful African lady named Anowa. We will compose a custom exposition test on Anowa-Whose Fault? or then again any comparative theme just for you Request Now She isn't care for any of the other customary ladies in the town. Anowa likes to settle on her own decisions and lives by her own conclusions. The older folks call her obstinate, she won’t wed any of the durable men in the town, she snickers at her own jokes, hear her out own stories, and follows her own recommendation (67). They all trust her vision is blurred. Her mom, Badua, wishes to see her wed a man and her dad could mind less what she does. She winds up meeting a man, Kofi, in the town and experiences passionate feelings for him. She nonsensically escapes with him and weds him. She totally abandons her family and starts an existence with Kofi. After some time, they fall away from one another do to correspondence issues and richness issues. Because of the monstrous agony and sorrow from the circumstance, Kofi and Anowa both slaughter each other at long last. There is banter inside the content about who was to blame for the unfortunate consummation. Many state that Anowa was the sole explanation behind their suicides. In spite of the fact that everybody in the general public is to blame. Anowa’s guardians, Anowa, Kofi, and the customary society are to blame. Badua has ruined Anowa for an amazing majority. She has permitted her girl to act and think as she wishes. Badua states, â€Å"how would she be able to gone to any great when everybody is continually tattling about her? † (70). The mother is to blame for permitting her youngster to let her brain run free as a kid and into her pre-adulthood. She needed her girl to have control and afterward when she had it and decided to be with Kofi, her mom turned out to be controlling and furious. As Badua whines to Osam, Anowa’s father, about her little girl not finding a spouse, Osam keeps in touch with her grumbling off by saying that his solitary obligation was to make kids (71). Osam proceeds to clarify that he needed her to turn into a priestess. Badua would not hear him out. She secured her ears and clarified that priestess’ are not individuals; they are an excess of like Gods they decipher, they don’t feel and they have no disgrace (72). Osam is to blame since he keeps away from the circumstance. He doesn’t care what Anowa picks and he doesn’t care to tune in to his own significant other. On page 78, Osam states his view about Anowa being juvenile. Despite the fact that he knows this, not once did he effectively make her a more â€Å"mature† lady (78). On page 91, Badua states how she ought to have â€Å"taught (Anowa) to wed a man. † It is unexpected considering she doesn’t have an extraordinary marriage and picked a man who doesn’t care. Badua and Osam are at fault for Anowa’s conduct. Anowa assumes a huge job in the catastrophe. Despite the fact that she isn't the just one to fault, she is by a long shot one of the primary purposes behind the suicides. There is nothing amiss with her needing to think and pick all alone. However she picks a man she met off the road; A man whom many see as unsatisfactory for any lady around. At the point when she meets him, she has her legs and her bosoms uncovered (69). While Kofi and Anowa were swooning in the town, a lady glanced back at them and falls over. The two of them chuckle, finding the circumstance amusing, however it shows the low development level the two of them have (69). When Kofi proposes, Anowa runs home and is shouting in the boulevards. Badua discloses to her she is wedding a â€Å"fool,† a â€Å"watery male. † Badua discloses to Anowa that â€Å"marriage resembles a bit of cloth†¦it’s excellence goes with mileage. She was attempting to clarify that what tallies is what is within, not the outside. Anowa promptly reacts with, â€Å"I don’t care! † (77). She is being silly and rash. She isn’t pondering what is best for her. She is contemplating her own wants and is being childish. Nobody in the story g enuinely realizes what is correct or wrong. After she escapes with Kofi, she continually contends with him. She expresses that she doesn’t need any security and that she can deal with herself. She accepts she can do everything all alone. She is uninformed. Kofi reacts with authenticity yet she generally needs to battle him in any case. There are times when Kofi needs to illuminate her with another idea, for example, medication, however she promptly kills him. She isn't receptive and isn’t ready to forfeit anything for him (85). However she expects every other person and Kofi to be liberal. Anowa will converse with herself about Kofi instead of simply conversing with Kofi about what’s going on in her mind. In the event that she doesn't get her direction, she misrepresents her feelings, such as saying she was going to â€Å"cut her throat. † (90). For quite a long time, she realizes she is despondent and that she sees no future for herself with him. Rather than standing up to that, she battles Kofi and agitators against all that he picks. Anowa’s adolescence is seen even toward the finish of the book when she brings in everybody from town to recount Kofi’s choice to show her out of the house and to uncover him of his fruitlessness and absence of manliness (121). You can’t reprimand individuals for not having the right response to everything, except it’s evident that Anowa is mostly to fault. All through the entire story, Kofi plays the person in question. He controls the circumstance to cause it to appear as though he isn’t to blame for anything and that he has settled on all the best options he figures he could have made. Much the same as Anowa, he converses with himself regularly about the issues inside their relationship and how he feels however they never convey those things together. When Anowa expresses her genuine thoughts, Kofi asks who disclosed to her that data, as though she couldn’t have an independent mind. Kofi just lives by what others state is correct or wrong, as opposed to tuning in to himself. Anowa needs to continue working however he thinks they reserve the privilege to rest. He never makes a trade off with her expressing that she could work in the event that she truly needed to. Kofi can tell that Anowa is despondent however he could mind less. He does nothing to cause her to feel more joyful. From the earliest starting point of the story, the subject of his manliness is developing. The elderly people ladies clarifies how he â€Å"combs his hair to an extreme. † (80). When Anowa starts to see they can't have kids, she accepts she is to blame. At the point when she offers to discover Kofi another lady. This is the ordinary convention for their way of life, yet he gets irritated at her assistance. This is one time in the story where he decides not to follow customary ways. At a certain point, he needs to purchase men and Anowa doesn't care for this thought. She expresses that she doesn’t need assistance from other men. Kofi says, â€Å"if you don’t, I do. † (90). Which is as yet not a decent clarification or explanation behind getting them. He clarifies that they will be aides and that they won’t be â€Å"carrying† him or anything of that sort. Before the finish of the book, these men are conveying him. â€Å"But the Kofi of the exchange bondage, who at last relies upon slave work, is the Kofi of the overabundance that adulterates the spirit. The new Kofi, who has made a settlement with the fiend of material achievement regardless of at whose cost, is now dead some time before his suicide† (Ngugi wa Thiong’o). After some time, Kofi starts to dress better and is consistently with the men he purchased. He sees a specialist at one point in the story and discovers that he can't have youngsters. Despite the fact that he has this data, he despite everything faults Anowa as though it was her shortcoming they couldn’t have youngsters. He never discloses to her that he is the one with the issue. Anowa raises the issue again towards the finish of the book. She says she needs to discover him another spouse to have youngsters with and he gets frantic at her. Anowa has a revelation and asks, â€Å"Are you biting the dust? † (117). She understands that he is the one with the ripeness issue and has keeping it from her. She expresses that his has â€Å"exhausted his masculinity,† that he is â€Å"dead wood. † (122). She does the entirety of this before everybody in the network. She embarrasses him and he runs off and shoots himself. She at that point suffocates herself before long. Everybody in the story was accusing every other person. They all had various reasons and various conclusions about who was at fault for the catastrophe. Due to Anowa’s untraditional soul, a significant number of the individuals censured her for everything. The reality of the situation is that everybody in the story was to blame. Nobody needed to impart appropriately, nobody was taught accurately, everybody had a gigantic conscience and nobody was eager to work anything out. Everybody was unreasonable and juvenile. Everybody is to be faulted for the suicides. List of sources Literature of Developing Nations for Students,  ©2013 Gale Cengage. Recovered at: http://www. enotes. com/anowa. Ngugi wa Thiong’0. Ama Ata Aidoo: A Personal Celebration. April, 2012. Recovered at: http://www. newafricanmagazine. com/highlights/culture/ama-ata-aidoo-an individual festival. Aidoo, Ama Ata, Anowa, Longman Group, 1970. Step by step instructions to refer to Anowa-Whose Fault?, Papers

What to Expect From Assertive Community Treatment

What to Expect From Assertive Community Treatment Addiction Coping and Recovery Print The Basics of Assertive Community Treatment By Arlin Cuncic Arlin Cuncic, MA, is the author of Therapy in Focus: What to Expect from CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder and 7 Weeks to Reduce Anxiety. Learn about our editorial policy Arlin Cuncic Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on April 05, 2019 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on April 19, 2019 More in Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Overcoming Addiction Personal Stories Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Drug Use Nicotine Use In This Article Table of Contents Expand Definition History Who It Serves Locations Characteristics Services Provided Benefits Criticisms View All Back To Top Assertive community treatment (ACT) is a form of community-based mental health care for individuals experiencing serious mental illness that interferes with their ability to live in the community, attend appointments with professionals in clinics and hospitals, and manage mental health symptoms. If you or someone you know has been referred to an assertive community treatment program, you may be wondering whether this is the best option and what it will entail. Rest assured that ACT is an evidence-based practice that has been studied for several decades, and has likely been offered to you for specific reasons. Definition of ACT The simple definition of assertive community treatment is an intensive, integrated approach to community mental health service delivery. What this means is that mental health services are provided in a community setting (rather than a more restrictive residential or hospital setting) to people experiencing serious mental illness. The mission of ACT is to help people become independent and integrate into the community as they experience recovery. Secondary goals include reducing homelessness and unnecessary hospital stays. In this way, ACT offers treatment in the real world and the team of professionals provides help using a whole team approach. Many people suffer from symptoms of mental illness that impact their ability to function in daily life and that land them in the hospital emergency department seeking services. The goal of ACT is to reduce this reliance on hospitals by providing round-the-clock services to the people who need it most. In this way, assertive community treatment could be expected to help to reduce preventable outcomes of mental illness, such as homelessness and substance abuse. History How did assertive community treatment get its start? Go back to the 1970s and a picture will quickly emerge of a shift away from institutionalization of patients with severe mental illness. At the same time, community services were poorly set up to help these people who were no longer living in institutional settings. The founders of ACT were Leonard I. Stein, Mary Ann Test, Arnold J. Marx, Deborah J. Allness, William H. Knoedler and other colleagues at Mendota Mental Health Insitute in Madison, Wisconsin (a state psychiatric hospital). As unusual as it sounds, at the time that assertive community treatment first came into being, it was considered a radical approach. Since that time, however, it has become one of the most important delivery methods for specific populations of those with mental illness. Whats more, the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) has been on board, publishing a manual for ACT in 1998 and operating a training and advocacy center from 1998 to 2004. Who Assertive Community Treatment Serves If you or a family member has been assigned ACT services, you might wonder why you were chosen to receive this type of service. Below is a list of the most common reasons a person will be offered assertive community treatment services: persons with severe symptoms of mental illnesspeople with significant thought disorders such as schizophreniayoung adults experiencing early-stage schizophreniapeople with stigmatized mental illnessespersons with high rates of substance abusepeople with a significant history of traumathose with frequent hospital stayspeople experiencing homelessness due to mental illnesspersons with overlapping physical and mental illnesses (for instance, hard-of-hearing individuals with a mental illness)persons experiencing psychiatric crisespeople with mental illness in the criminal justice systemrefugees with mental illnesspeople unlikely to attend appointments at hospitals or clinicspeople who have not responded well to traditional outpatient care ACT Locations Assertive community treatment has been implemented in countries such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. For example, specifically in the United States, ACT was implemented across the country by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Services are not provided in a clinic, but rather in the patients home, in community locations (such as a coffee shop, restaurant, or public park), in homeless shelters, or wherever is most appropriate and convenient for the person using the service. Characteristics If you are about to enter assertive community treatment, you are probably unsure of what to expect. Most ACT programs have similar structures, so the following may give you some guidance on what the program will offer. Your treatment plan will be centered around your own personal strengths, needs, and desires for the futureACT is offered long-term but not unlimited; the goal is to eventually transition you to other services or for you to maintain what you have learned on your ownThe focus of ACT is on community integration and getting you back to living a normal lifeACT follows a holistic approach to treatment, meaning that all areas of your life are targets for improvementACT usually has a ratio of about 10:1, meaning that for every 10 clients there will be one team member assignedMost clients have multiple contacts with team members each weekACT is offered 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to ensure that you always have the help you needAn ACT team generally includes a psychiatrist, social workers, nurses, occupational therapists, peer support specialists, and moreACT is a considered a medically monitored non-residential service, which is two steps down from the highest level of service (medically ma naged residential service)Team members will develop long-term relationships with you regardless of whether you become homeless or find yourself incarceratedWhen you are doing better, you will be transitioned out of the ACT program Services Provided by ACT What are the specific services that you can expect to receive from the ACT team? The following is a list of some of the primary services that assertive community treatment offers: initial and ongoing assessmentspsychiatric services such as coping with psychotic episodes or crisessubstance abuse serviceshelp with employment and housingeducation for family members and you about your mental illnesstreatment planning and monitoringaccompanying you to medical appointments and dentist appointmentsrepresentation at court hearingshelp with finances (such as managing money and paying bills)helping you to grow confident with housekeeping, shopping, cooking, and transportationemployment support such as finding and keeping a jobhelp to order and manage medications The Benefits Overall, research evidence on assertive community treatment has been positive with some caveats. A 2016 evidence review showed that ACT reduced self-reported psychiatric symptoms, hospital stays, and emergency department visits among people with mental illness and substance abuse. In general, from the dozens of randomized controlled trials that have been conducted, it can be concluded that ACT is more effective than standard services in reducing hospital use, but findings for other outcomes are less clear. While studies have shown improvements in housing, symptom management, and quality of life for ACT, these findings were most evident for people who tended to return to hospitals often. It has been noted that ACT may be most helpful in communities that do not have well coordinated mental health care systems, which result in overuse of hospitals by those with serious mental illness. For example, ACT may show better outcomes in the United States than in the United Kingdom, because the former has a poorly coordinated system for mental health care that results in more hospital stays, while the latter has a well-coordinated system that already includes many aspects of ACT in its standard care. Other research has shown ACT to be more effective than standard care in reducing the risk of hospital stays and incarceration, specifically in poor inner-city neighborhoods, and reducing alcohol use or incarceration among those with antisocial personality disorder. Furthermore, among the homeless, it has been shown that ACT results in more satisfaction with care and more stable housing situations than standard care. This is easy to understand when you consider the ACT modelâ€"homeless individuals meet service providers where it is convenient for them are more likely to benefit from services than those who must travel to receive help. Finally, in a Cochrane review of 38 clinical trials from the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia, it was shown that ACT was more effective than standard care in lowering the time spent in hospitals and improving social functioning and independent living. At the same time, mental health and quality of life were not shown to improve more than when standard care was offered. Overall, the research evidence suggests that ACT is most helpful for people with serious mental illness as a method to keep them out of the hospital and in the community. Criticism of ACT Overall, there have been some criticisms of the ACT program. One is that ACT is simply a system of coercion in which hospitals deny admission to patients based on their enrollment in the ACT program. At the same time, isnt staying in the community the goal of all mental health initiatives? In this way, it seems that regardless of whether the tactics are coercive, if patients can be treated in the community where they live, tracked through prison and homeless shelters, and offered 24/7 care at their convenience, then the benefits may be worth the drawbacks. A Word From Verywell If you have been assigned to receive assertive community treatment services, you may feel nervous about what to expect or what sort of support you will receive. Know that your team will be available to answer questions and offer support to you long-term in the community at locations that serve you best. As a person living with serious mental illness, ACT is an effective long-term support that should serve you well. Mental Health and Addiction